<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.ami-communities.eu/drupal">
<channel>
 <title>iperez&#039;s blog</title>
 <link>http://www.ami-communities.eu/drupal/~iperez</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Is Living &quot;Lab&quot; a good name?</title>
 <link>http://www.ami-communities.eu/drupal/node/97</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is Living Lab a good name for this activity when we are involving human being?&lt;br /&gt;
The activity is clear enough but who wants to be participant in a lab? Understanding for participant the object under study.&lt;br /&gt;
Living Lab activity consider citizen as part of the innovation process as a participant and not as a &quot;object under study&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
The idea behind this comment is that we all, as coordinators of Living Labs, must be careful when talking about that to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
So, will they understand that they are participants of a Lab instead of an object of study?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.ami-communities.eu/drupal/taxonomy/term/12">LivingLabs@Work</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:25:07 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

